User:
terminus
Date: 15/11/2009 4:58 pm
Views: 416
Rating: 3
Rate [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5 ]
On the first day of the Sharm el Sheikh meeting of the Internet Governance Forum, it is clear that if the IGF's mandate isn't renewed following its fifth meeting next year, at least it will go out in style. Like the host countries that preceded them, the Egyptian hosts have learned from the mistakes of the past, and insisted on raising the bar.
An Egyptian-themed IGF Village has emerged mirage-like this morning from what yesterday was a construction zone. Power outlets positively bristle from underneath every few seats. Internet is (mostly) fast and strong. An embarrassing abundance of food is provided. Main sessions now provide
plain text streaming - something I've previously suggested, and even sign-language.
Not all is well, though. With so many workshops having been scheduled, it is perhaps only to be expected that there would be errors in the programme - but it is worrying that details of the same workshops differ between
one page and
another of the IGF's Web site.
Moreover, two days ago all the workshop times for Wednesday the 18th were changed to make way for a new session from the host nation. Workshop organisers were not informed of this; we're still discovering the change by osmosis. It is certain that many will turn up on Wednesday expecting to attend a workshop that already began an hour earlier. (On a similar but more mundane note, many delegates missed lunch because they had not been told where to find it.)
Finally, in a forum where open standards and access to knowledge are strongly advocated, it should not be the case that all the public computers still run Microsoft Windows and that
proprietary Webcasting software is employed. I found it especially ironic that the
description of the workshop on "Web Accessibility" is only made available in Microsoft Word format.
Still, the mood is positive and most peoples' intentions are good. This alone isn't reason for the extension of the IGF's mandate. But as the title of this post suggests, a new IGF may be on the way - not another meeting, but a new understanding of the purpose of the organisation. At yesterday's meeting of the Internet Governance Caucus, representatives of the IGF Secretariat let slip that as a condition of its renewal, the new IGF might be empowered to conclude recommendations - something for which I have been advocating for three years.
Here's to the future of the IGF.