My name is Jeremy Malcolm and I'm now speaking only on my own behalf, though some of these points do enjoy broader support. The document that we produce I believe should be a declaration of its participants, rather than a mere Chairman's summary.
I would also like us to concretise some of the general and aspirational statements that currently appear in the roadmap section.
First, the European Commission in a statement from Vice-President Kroes has put forward a set of concrete suggestions about what steps could be taken next and when, in relation to improvement of the IGF, strengthening of the multi-stakeholder model and so on. Those suggestions do not seem in any way controversial and I suggest that we add them to the outcome document.
Secondly, paragraph 39 of the document acknowledges one very important issue, but puts it into the “too hard” basket” - the “Different roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.” I suggest that we don't just acknowledge the issue but specify where it could be discussed next, and I feel that that should be the IGF.
However, we should also encourage the IGF to adopt a deliberative plenary process for this task, based on that conducted at NETmundial. NETmundial is a one-off forum, so we need to make sure the value of this innovative process is not lost, and the IGF is a perfect forum to take it up, in fulfilment of its mandate to make recommendations where appropriate.